"You cannot deny guilt, and thereby you allow the Curse to be your due": Lower court grants Divorce to husband after 19-years for 20-day marriage, Wife challenges order in High Court, not exceptional case as our courts are flooded with endless litigations

Divorce rate in India is just about 1%. Surely, that doesn’t mean all other couples are living in paradise. If one accounts for the number of couples officially separated in India without a legal divorce, the revelation can be beyond shocking.
|
Are Family Courts Battleground To Settle Egos?
A couple who was married for just 20 days, was granted a divorce after 20 years of a court battle. Don’t be shocked because these are not exceptional cases and our courts are flooded with these endless litigations.
Commenting on the slow justice delivery system in India, Dharmesh Sharma, the principal judge of the family court in Delhi said,
It casts a very sickening feeling in my mind.
The judge blamed both the parties as well as their lawyers, however, attributed the delay to the legal system in our country which has been overburdened at every front. The civil, as well as criminal courts in India, have millions of cases pending, and this case proves that we are in no way close to the idea of fast-track courts.
Case:
53-year-old Thirumoorthy Ramakrishnan and 49-year-old Subhashini Bala Subramanian got married in 1998. However, the couple separated after 20 days of their married life together – after the wife got arrested in a case of fraud – that she maintained she was wrongly accused of.
Husband filed for divorce on grounds of ‘cruelty’ after suffering immense stress on learning of his wife’s fraud case. The wife was arrested from Ooty, where the newlywed couple had gone to visit temples.
Wife’s Clarification
The wife accused her husband of ‘abandoning’ her and leaving her to fend for herself and their daughter on her own. Incidentally, it was on the last day of her remand after she was brought to Delhi for her trial, when she told her husband that she was carrying their child.
Husband’s Side
The man moved court, seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds that following the arrest of his wife, he was interrogated by the police on a number of occasions. As a part of the legal battle that ensued, enquiries made at the workplace of the husband which resulted in ‘deep mental and physical cruelty’ for him. Apparently, he also told the court that the woman kept her professional qualifications and other essential details hidden from him, only aggravating his tension.
Delhi Court
The court granted divorce in the year 2017, saying that the arrest, detention and criminal prosecution of the wife, whether innocent or not of the charges, so early into their marriage caused the husband exceptional hardship and was inflicted with intolerable mental cruelty. Judge Sharma quoted:
Unfortunate as it may look, this case is coming up for the final decision after nineteen years of its institution initially before the family court. The most unfortunate aspect of this case is that the parties cohabited hardly for about 20 days before calamity struck the newly married bride, having pernicious repercussions on the mindset of her husband. The marriage has irretrievably broken down despite the fact the parties are quite educated and hail from an affluent class of society, and I only wish they should have settled their differences in an amicable manner instead of suffering the agony of protracted matrimonial litigation.
Thirumoorthy Ramakrishnan’s advocate Saurabh Chauhan said that if the case had been sorted in a normal time span of 1-2 years, he would have re-married. However, the delay in decisions from the court has left everyone in a very tough situation. Chauhan quoted:
Protracted legal battles in our system end up spoiling a person’s life. A marriage going bad is an accident. It can happen to anyone.
Year 2017
The man has reportedly shifted abroad, while his ex-wife works as an accountant here. Their daughter passed Class 12 with 94 percent.
Matter Not Over
Anil Sharma, counsel for the wife, told that they have moved the high court in appeal. Speaking back in 2017 to India Today, he said,
The charges leveled by the husband on my client also amount to cruelty. The husband abandoned the wife and daughter when they required him the most. He also never took care of the daughter’s expenses. The woman has brought up the girl singlehandedly.
MDO Take:
One of the main reasons, for couples being trapped in loveless and unhappy marriages in India, is the absolute failure of family courts to deliver justice or verdict within a stipulated time. Often contested divorces may take a minimum of two decades to reach Supreme Court, by when the couples have grown old and have very less opportunity to rebuild their personal life again. While the judiciary often blames this on the unimaginable number of cases per judge at each level, there has been no change in redundant 20th Century laws whatsoever. There were many hopes from the Modi government, however, we have failed to see any action on this front in the past 7-years of governance.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- “We know what we are, but know not what we may be”: Every human being has right to choose his or her gender identity: Rajasthan High Court ordered authorities to consider changing the records of a man who secured a job under the General Female Category
- In a shocking rebuke, the Madras High Court warns of a slide into autocracy after a massive 10-year legal delay in DMK leader M. Appavu’s 2016 Radhapuram election case finally ended with AIADMK’s Inbadurai losing his win
- In an unexpected turn, the Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing her newborn; says High Court, trial court possibly didn't respect her right to privacy, it's enlightening to see how privacy might now overshadow the scales of justice, isn't it?
- “A mother’s arms are made of tenderness and children sleep soundly in them”: Bombay High Court grants bail to woman accused of throwing her newborn baby from top of building, she was upset with her husband, and suspected of him committing adultery
- Madras High Court noted that 'tolerance is the hallmark of Hinduism, devotees could not be denied their right to worship at any cost': directed authorities to allow chanting prayers at Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple
- "How many different kinds of ruin do you have to see, before you resign yourself to calling it all 'ruin'?": UP Court gives death penalty to Haleem and Rizwan in a minor's gang rape case, injuries caused made her physically and mentally handicapped
- "Judge saheb ko bura laga kya… nahi, bas yunhi pooch riya hun": CJI Ramana slams Indian media amid the backlash judiciary is facing over controversial remarks and judgements, says ‘Media running agenda-driven debates and kangaroo courts’
- "चारा भाईचारा के बारे में सोचें": Kerala HC stirs debate by asking to rethink non-Hindu ban after Christian priests entered Adoor Sree Parthasarathi Temple, raising serious concerns over judicial interference in Hindu religious laws
- "अच्छा": Despite serious allegations, the court granted interim bail to Meeran Haider, a PhD student who orchestrated the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots, mobilizing crowds and coordinating violence across 20 sites, revealing deep-seated plots against CAA-NRC
- "Finally, in conclusion, let me say just this": Remark against Prophet Mohammad - Supreme Court transfers all FIRs against ex-BJP member Naveen Kumar Jindal to Delhi Police, during the hearing, Luthra sought similar relief as granted in Arnab Goswami case
- "To no one we shall sell, to no one we shall deny or defer right or justice": Delhi High Court refuses to entertain Sameer Wankhede plea seeking protection in the disproportionate assets case, came to limelight as NCB questioned celebrities in drugs case
- CJI BR Gavai avoids pressing charges after Delhi lawyer Rakesh Kishore’s shoe attack over anti-Hindu remark on the Vishnu idol case, fearing the Streisand effect that could expose his judicial bias and hypocrisy
- “A bench of Justices chosen through collegium got to choose to decide who has the better lawyer”: Karnataka government supports High Court verdict upholding marital rape charges against husband which is another stark violation of human rights
- Order of Gujarat State Waqf Tribunal which halted the construction of a railway track near 'Firoz Saheb ni dargah' is set aside by Gujarat High Court
- "Chutiyaram": Delhi’s Trade Marks Registry shockingly approved ‘CHUTIYARAM’ for Sadhna Goswami’s namkeen and biscuits, but later on withdrawing it after two weeks, admitting Balaji’s epic fail let a crude mark dodge Section 9(2)(c), sparking a hearing
















