‘Lord Krishna was the first mediator’: SC slams UP’s ₹500cr temple takeover bid, halts fund use, questions secret court order, and proposes retired judge panel to oversee Banke Bihari Temple while preserving goswami traditions amid ordinance challenge

On August 4, the Supreme Court referred to Lord Krishna as the “first mediator” while hearing the sensitive and ongoing dispute regarding the management of the revered Shri Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh. The statement was made during deliberations between the Uttar Pradesh government and the temple authorities. The Court’s invocation of Krishna’s role as a peacemaker from the Mahabharata was a symbolic reminder of the need for balance and resolution.
|
The bench, led by Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, sharply criticised the Uttar Pradesh government for its “tearing hurry” in enforcing the Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025. This ordinance proposes a government-led takeover of the temple’s administration, which has traditionally remained with the ‘goswami’ families for centuries.
Adding to the concerns, the Court expressed displeasure at the “clandestine manner” in which the government managed to secure a judgment on May 15—one that permitted the usage of the temple’s financial reserves to fund a corridor redevelopment project. The bench noted that this was done “by filing an application in a pending civil dispute”, bypassing open deliberation.
In light of these developments, the Court suggested recalling the earlier directions and instead recommended forming a neutral committee led by a retired High Court judge to supervise the temple’s affairs during the legal review period. The ordinance’s constitutional validity is now to be examined by the Allahabad High Court.
During the session, the Supreme Court firmly instructed that “temple rituals will continue under the existing family tradition.” This was a significant reassurance to the goswamis, who have for generations performed the daily rites at the temple.
The Uttar Pradesh government had introduced the ordinance with plans to spend ₹500 crore from the temple’s resources for a large-scale corridor redevelopment project. In light of this, the Court once again encouraged peaceful resolution and dialogue, stating: “Lord Krishna was the first mediator, please try to mediate the matter.”
It was proposed that a part of the Supreme Court’s May 15 judgement—which gave the state authority over the temple funds—be kept in abeyance until further evaluation. During this time, a retired High Court or District Judge may be appointed as the managing trustee, ensuring that temple administration remains impartial.
The justices further directed that “the daily rituals of the temple would be continued by the ‘goswamis’ as before.” The committee, meanwhile, would include representatives from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for cultural preservation, and local administration officials like the District Collector, to ensure comprehensive development of the heritage site.
The Uttar Pradesh government has been asked to file a response to these proposals by 10:30 AM on August 5, when the matter is scheduled to resume.
According to the 2025 UP Ordinance, the state envisions the formation of a statutory trust titled “Shri Banke Bihari Ji Mandir Nyas.” This trust will oversee both the temple’s administration and the facilities available to devotees. The structure includes seven ex-officio members and eleven nominated trustees, with a specific condition that all must be followers of Sanatan Dharma, whether they belong to governmental or non-governmental institutions.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "There is difference between blasphemy and expressing religious opinions based on one’s knowledge of the subject": Historic decision by Madras High Court from 2019
- Ruling that no minor can be forced to give birth, Supreme Court permitted a 15-year-old to terminate her 7-month pregnancy, citing Article 21 to protect bodily autonomy and prevent severe mental trauma or the dangers of illegal clinics
- Madhya Pradesh HC accepted petition for stay on Muslims performing Namaz in the compound of Bhojshala monument: Read how an educational centre and a historic temple of Goddess Saraswati became Kamal Maulana mosque
- "Freedom is whatever the Court says it is, pending revision": Kiren Rijiju in Rajya Sabha, "Until we create a new system for Appointment of Judges, issue of Judicial Vacancies will continue to arise which is a big reason for the huge pendency of cases"
- "Vote: The only commodity that is peddleable without a license": Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Calcutta High Court's direction for deployment of central forces in West Bengal for local body elections, dismisses the petitions by the State and SEC
- "Emails For Justice": The SC fast-tracks Moitra's plea after CJI's email invite; when emailing judges is the secret weapon, Moitra's urgent plea against Lok Sabha expulsion becomes a test case for judicial responsiveness in high-profile scenarios
- Madras High Court noted that 'tolerance is the hallmark of Hinduism, devotees could not be denied their right to worship at any cost': directed authorities to allow chanting prayers at Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple
- SC grants protection to Nupur Sharma from arrest in multiple FIRs after pointed out of an imminent necessity for intervention of Court to protect her life and liberty, also noted Chisti’s remarks wherein he asked for cutting of her throat
- Justice Yashwant Varma, caught in a storm after firemen found piles of cash in his Delhi home, now challenges the SC's inquiry while hiding his identity, as the court questions his delay, his silence, and his refusal to explain how the money got there
- "Tradition on trial": In a backdrop of temple tensions, the Supreme Court agrees to hear pleas on Tamil Nadu's move to appoint 'non-believers' as priests. The state's rich heritage now intersects with faith, politics, and looming threats of vandalism
- "We are all born gifted. That is our true inheritance": Supreme Court observes that female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession, says "Not to grant benefit of 'Survivorship to daughter in father's property' is bad Law"
- Madras High Court: Do not take decision on melting Temple gold till Trustees are appointed
- "Can omnibus orders be passed against demolitions": Supreme Court asks in Jamiat pleas challenging "Bulldozer" actions against anti-social elements in Uttar Pradesh and other states, refuses to pass interim orders, next hearing on Aug 10
- Supreme Court of India led by BR Gavai halts key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 after long Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha debates, sparking fears of judicial overreach
- “We know what we are, but know not what we may be”: Every human being has right to choose his or her gender identity: Rajasthan High Court ordered authorities to consider changing the records of a man who secured a job under the General Female Category
















