"The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat

In an impactful decision on Monday, August 14th, India's highest court - the Supreme Court - remained unwavering in its stance regarding the Godhra train burning incident of 2002. Despite the pleas, the court chose not to extend bail to three individuals previously convicted in relation to the tragedy.
|
This horrifying incident from two decades ago is etched in India's memory. A malicious, planned attack culminated in the heart-wrenching deaths of 59 innocent pilgrims. Among the deceased were 27 women and 10 children, whose lives were tragically cut short.
The significant case was heard by a panel of esteemed judges, consisting of the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, alongside Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The gravity of the incident was highlighted by the Chief Justice himself, who pointedly remarked, "The incident is not only severe but also more than just a solitary death."
Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo. He firmly stated that the case needs prompt attention and deliberation. "This case requires immediate hearing. We cannot put it off indefinitely," he added.
|
|
While the apex court maintained its position against granting bail at this juncture, there's a glimmer of hope for the convicts. The Chief Justice indicated that a specially constituted bench would take up the matter, suggesting the convicts could try their luck again by presenting their bail pleas to this new bench.
The Sabarmati Express tragedy from February 27, 2002, is one that evokes sharp memories and emotions. On that fateful day, a mob, driven by extremist ideologies, targeted two coaches of the train in Godhra, resulting in a ghastly scene where 59 Hindu karsevaks, comprising children and women, perished in flames.
But the train attack was just the beginning. The incident ignited communal tensions across Gujarat, spiraling into riots that claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 people, injuring several thousands in the process.
Legal proceedings in connection with the incident have been lengthy and complex. Initially, in 2011, a designated court decreed death sentences for 11 of the convicts and life sentences for 20 others. However, a change came in 2017 when the Gujarat High Court, after reviewing the case, decided to modify the death penalties to life imprisonments. The same court, though, confirmed the life terms handed down to the other 20 individuals.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- ‘Graves turning into radical pilgrimage spots’: Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking removal of Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhat’s graves from Tihar Jail citing security concerns
- "Virtue can only flourish among equals": Law Commission of India solicits views & ideas of the public and recognized religious organizations about Uniform Civil Code, interested can present their views within a period of 30 days from the date of Notice
- "Re-examine all that you have been told... dismiss that which insults your soul": Supreme Court dismisses plea against appointing Justice DY Chandrachud as CJI, said "No reason to entertain this petition. It is completely misconceived. Thus dismissed"
- "Tradition on Trial: Festivity Faces the Bench": A judicial spark ignites communal debate on tradition as the Kerala High Court orders raid of all religious places to seize illegal crackers; says no holy book commands bursting firecrackers to please God
- "The miracle isn't that I finished. The miracle is that I had the courage to start": 49th Chief Justice of India, Uday Umesh Lalit's short tenure is a race against time with big plans lined up, he intends to meet head-on the challenges confronting SC
- "काफ़िर-ए-आबरू तार-तार, ख़्वाब-ए-ग़ज़वा-ए-हिंद बरक़रार": Kheda police arrested Parvez Pathan and seven others for a 3 year sexual exploitation and digital blackmail of a minor girl in Gujarat under what officials call a deep and well-planned conspiracy
- "Ayodhya hui hamari, ab Kashi-Mathura ki baari": Plea submitted in Mathura Court to secure Shahi Idgah Masjid to protect Hindu sacred artefacts after Shivling discovered at wuzukhana in Gyanvapi premises
- "We are all born gifted. That is our true inheritance": Supreme Court observes that female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession, says "Not to grant benefit of 'Survivorship to daughter in father's property' is bad Law"
- Tehelka News | In a ground-breaking verdict, the Delhi High Court slapped Tehelka, Tarun Tejpal, Aniruddha Bahal, Mathew Samuel with an order to pay ₹2 crore to Major General MS Ahluwalia following a 2001 sting operation that defamed the ex-Army officer
- "What a sad era when it is easier to smash an atom than a prejudice": Supreme Court declines to entertain PIL for creation of National Commission for Men to look into suicides among married men, says "No question of misplaced sympathy for anyone"
- "अंधा कानून": Rajasthan High Court overturns a decades-old rape conviction, ruling that removing a minor’s innerwear and undressing oneself does not constitute an 'attempt to rape,' but rather 'outraging the modesty of a woman' under Section 354 IPC
- "There is difference between blasphemy and expressing religious opinions based on one’s knowledge of the subject": Historic decision by Madras High Court from 2019
- In another shocker, Supreme Court quotes 'every sinner has a future' and commutes death sentence of Mohd Firoz for rape & murder of 4-year-old girl: Child brutally assaulted, two teeth broken while smothering after rape
- ‘आशिक़ी का वो ज़माना याद है’: Bombay HC grants bail to Mohammed Ajaan Khan, accused of raping minor, citing not a sexual predator but a young person in consensual relationship, despite her underage status, two pregnancies, and abortions
- Milords, why demand to stand above criticism when democracy thrives on questioning, for Justice B Sudershan Reddy’s Salwa Judum verdict shows even judges must face accountability, no matter how powerful their robes once were
















