More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
Amreli court sentenced Kasim Haji Solanki, Sattar Ismail Solanki and Akram Haji Solanki to life as Baharpara raid found 40 kg cow meat confirmed by forensic tests rejecting the claims of police to framing

On 11 November, the Amreli Sessions Court announced life imprisonment for three men involved in a 2023 cow slaughter case. The men found guilty were identified as Kasim Haji Solanki, Sattar Ismail Solanki, and Akram Haji Solanki.
In its judgment, the court clearly said that even though the accused were fully aware that the cow is a sacred animal for Hindus, they still went ahead with slaughtering it. The court noted that their act “hurt the sentiments of the community”, making the offence extremely serious in nature.
|
What exactly happened in the case?
The case dates back to November 2023, when the Amreli City Police carried out a raid at a house located in the Motakhatkiwad area of Baharpara village. This action was taken after the police received a confidential tip-off. During the raid, officers recovered 40 kg of animal meat from the house. The house belonged to Kasim Haji Solanki, who was present during the operation.
The seized meat was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for examination, and the report confirmed that it was cow meat. Police also found weighing scales and other tools at the site, pointing towards the sale of cow meat.
During questioning, Kasim disclosed the names of two associates who had escaped during the raid. Both were later arrested. Following the arrests, Amreli City Police Station registered a case against all three men. The first hearing took place in the Sessions Court in 2024. After the trial, Principal District Judge Rizwana Bukhari convicted all three accused and ordered life imprisonment.
|
What observations did the court make?
In its judgment, the court stated that the three men were fully aware that the cow holds a highly sacred place in the Hindu faith. Despite this knowledge, they slaughtered the cow, and the recovered meat matched this finding. Because of this, the court ruled that offences under Section 295 of the IPC (damaging sacred objects with intent to insult a religion) and Section 429 of the IPC (killing or maiming animals) were proven.
The court also found the accused guilty under Sections 5, 6(c), 8(2), 8(4), and 10 of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 1954. They were sentenced to life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs 5 lakh for violating Sections 8(2) and 10.
Additional punishments included:
3 years’ imprisonment and Rs 3,000 fine under IPC Sections 295 and 114
5 years’ imprisonment and Rs 5,000 fine under IPC Section 429
7 years’ imprisonment and Rs 1 lakh fine under Sections 5 and 8(4) of the Gujarat Act
The court ordered all sentences to run concurrently. Since all three were out on bail during the trial, they were ordered to be taken back to jail immediately.
|
Court dismissed claims of false implication by police
Throughout the trial, the accused argued that they were innocent and had been framed by the police. They claimed the panchnama lacked independent witnesses and that the investigation was biased. However, the court rejected these points. It explained that the law gives equal weight to the testimony of police witnesses as long as their statements are credible.
The court further noted there was nothing on record to show that the police acted dishonestly. Reports from the veterinary doctor and FSL experts clearly confirmed the meat was cow meat. The accused were also unable to provide any explanation on how the cow meat was found in their possession. Based on all evidence and witness statements, the court concluded that the three men had jointly slaughtered the cattle and intended to sell the meat.
|
‘If the court becomes lenient, society will be affected negatively’
While deciding the sentence, the court made an important remark. It stated in clear words: “If the court adopts a lenient approach, it will have adverse effects on society and on the criminal mindset of the accused.” The court said that although punishments should not be unnecessarily harsh, leniency in such cases could lead to harmful consequences for the community. With this reasoning, all three men were sentenced to life imprisonment.
|
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- “Life is a matter of choices, and every choice you make makes you”: In a historic judgment, Supreme Court declared that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies of 20-24 weeks from consensual relationships on International Safe Abortion day
- "Justice for sale, affordability varies": In an escalating controversy, Udhayanidhi Stalin's fierce criticisms of Sanatana Dharma lead to public uproar & legal petitions, Supreme Court denies expedited hearing, ‘Won’t allow it, follow standard procedures’
- "कृष्णलला हम आयेंगे": Allahabad High Court delivers a historic verdict favoring Hindu devotees in the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, dismissing the Muslim side’s plea and affirming the legal standing of Hindu claims under key acts, marking a judicial milestone
- “If you’re good enough to hit the gym at 70, why not a courtroom?”: Age of retirement of Supreme Court and High Court Judges needs to be increased in sync with increase in the longevity and advancement in medical sciences, Parliamentary Committee
- ‘One tick, two wives’: Punjab & Haryana High Court rejects judiciary candidate Advocate Pradeep Kumar’s plea after he mistakenly declared ‘more than wife’ in application
- "चलो फिर से": Baba Ramdev claims "crores of people are dying" from toxic modern medicines, comparing their deadly impact to British rule, Islamic invasions, and revolutions by Lenin, Marx, and Mao, despite Supreme Court warnings against fearmongering
- "Ram Lalla Virajman": Meet K Parasaran, the 'Pitamah' of Indian laws, whose dedication to the Ram Janmabhoomi case was a profound dream, his unparalleled devotion saw him argue for hours barefoot, symbolizing his deep faith and commitment to justice
- ‘Do we roll out a red carpet?’ Supreme Court led by CJI Surya Kant issues a sharp warning as it questions illegal Rohingya migrants entering India and a rising crisis over missing refugees nationwide.
- Here are some of the points that the Parliamentary Standing Committee, headed by Shashi Tharoor, raised with Twitter
- "अल्हम्दुलिल्लाह!!! Mob has no religion": The Rajasthan High Court grants bail to 18 Islamists accused in the Hindu Shobha Yatra attack in Chittorgarh, highlighting the challenges of pinpointing culprits amidst the chaos of mob-induced communal violence
- "Honor thy error as a hidden intention": Delhi High Court orders social media platforms to take all permissible steps to block the circulation of the video, in which Delhi High Court judge can be seen in a compromising position with his Steno
- Supreme Court finally ends a 100-year fight over the Amogasidda temple in Karnataka, ruling that Sahebgouda’s family holds the true hereditary pujari rights over the rivals led by late Ogeppa
- In an unexpected turn, the Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing her newborn; says High Court, trial court possibly didn't respect her right to privacy, it's enlightening to see how privacy might now overshadow the scales of justice, isn't it?
- "How many different kinds of ruin do you have to see, before you resign yourself to calling it all 'ruin'?": UP Court gives death penalty to Haleem and Rizwan in a minor's gang rape case, injuries caused made her physically and mentally handicapped
- SC bench of Justices Chandrachud and AS Bopanna rules in favor of Muslim petitioner: “Don’t exclude non-Hindus from auction process for shop leases in temple”

























