More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
Amreli court sentenced Kasim Haji Solanki, Sattar Ismail Solanki and Akram Haji Solanki to life as Baharpara raid found 40 kg cow meat confirmed by forensic tests rejecting the claims of police to framing

On 11 November, the Amreli Sessions Court announced life imprisonment for three men involved in a 2023 cow slaughter case. The men found guilty were identified as Kasim Haji Solanki, Sattar Ismail Solanki, and Akram Haji Solanki.
In its judgment, the court clearly said that even though the accused were fully aware that the cow is a sacred animal for Hindus, they still went ahead with slaughtering it. The court noted that their act “hurt the sentiments of the community”, making the offence extremely serious in nature.
|
What exactly happened in the case?
The case dates back to November 2023, when the Amreli City Police carried out a raid at a house located in the Motakhatkiwad area of Baharpara village. This action was taken after the police received a confidential tip-off. During the raid, officers recovered 40 kg of animal meat from the house. The house belonged to Kasim Haji Solanki, who was present during the operation.
The seized meat was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for examination, and the report confirmed that it was cow meat. Police also found weighing scales and other tools at the site, pointing towards the sale of cow meat.
During questioning, Kasim disclosed the names of two associates who had escaped during the raid. Both were later arrested. Following the arrests, Amreli City Police Station registered a case against all three men. The first hearing took place in the Sessions Court in 2024. After the trial, Principal District Judge Rizwana Bukhari convicted all three accused and ordered life imprisonment.
|
What observations did the court make?
In its judgment, the court stated that the three men were fully aware that the cow holds a highly sacred place in the Hindu faith. Despite this knowledge, they slaughtered the cow, and the recovered meat matched this finding. Because of this, the court ruled that offences under Section 295 of the IPC (damaging sacred objects with intent to insult a religion) and Section 429 of the IPC (killing or maiming animals) were proven.
The court also found the accused guilty under Sections 5, 6(c), 8(2), 8(4), and 10 of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 1954. They were sentenced to life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs 5 lakh for violating Sections 8(2) and 10.
Additional punishments included:
3 years’ imprisonment and Rs 3,000 fine under IPC Sections 295 and 114
5 years’ imprisonment and Rs 5,000 fine under IPC Section 429
7 years’ imprisonment and Rs 1 lakh fine under Sections 5 and 8(4) of the Gujarat Act
The court ordered all sentences to run concurrently. Since all three were out on bail during the trial, they were ordered to be taken back to jail immediately.
|
Court dismissed claims of false implication by police
Throughout the trial, the accused argued that they were innocent and had been framed by the police. They claimed the panchnama lacked independent witnesses and that the investigation was biased. However, the court rejected these points. It explained that the law gives equal weight to the testimony of police witnesses as long as their statements are credible.
The court further noted there was nothing on record to show that the police acted dishonestly. Reports from the veterinary doctor and FSL experts clearly confirmed the meat was cow meat. The accused were also unable to provide any explanation on how the cow meat was found in their possession. Based on all evidence and witness statements, the court concluded that the three men had jointly slaughtered the cattle and intended to sell the meat.
|
‘If the court becomes lenient, society will be affected negatively’
While deciding the sentence, the court made an important remark. It stated in clear words: “If the court adopts a lenient approach, it will have adverse effects on society and on the criminal mindset of the accused.” The court said that although punishments should not be unnecessarily harsh, leniency in such cases could lead to harmful consequences for the community. With this reasoning, all three men were sentenced to life imprisonment.
|
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Supreme Court rejects Sanjiv Bhatt’s plea in the explosive 1996 drug planting case, as Kapil Sibal steps in to defend the disgraced ex-IPS officer amid mounting legal turmoil
- "चारा भाईचारा के बारे में सोचें": Kerala HC stirs debate by asking to rethink non-Hindu ban after Christian priests entered Adoor Sree Parthasarathi Temple, raising serious concerns over judicial interference in Hindu religious laws
- "होने ही नहीं दूँगा… कोई शक": CJI Surya Kant takes a stand in the Supreme Court vowing he won't allow anyone on earth to defame the judiciary after a new NCERT Class 8 textbook included claims about corruption in Indian courts
- “Keep your pity because you’re going to need all your pity for what’s coming”: Central Government declared PFI a terror outfit of radical Islam, its associates or fronts as an unlawful association and ban them with immediate effect, for a period of 5 year
- Minimum age of women for marriage is raised to 21 years: Union Cabinet clears proposal
- "Some judges are like umpires who believe they won the game": Madras High Court, "If temples are going to perpetuate violence, then their existence has no meaning, better to close down those temples. The whole purpose of having a temple is of no use"
- "A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on": Google moves Supreme Court against National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order upholding CCI's ₹1,337 crore penalty for abuse of dominant position within the Android ecosystem
- Madhya Pradesh High Court recently ruled that a Muslim man’s second marriage is not "void" under Section 494 IPC, as Sharia permits polygamy, highlighting how Indian courts often prioritize personal law over secular bigamy rules
- Supreme Court crushed Saquib Nachan’s attempt to whitewash ISIS by claiming ‘Caliphate’ and ‘Jihad’ had no terror link, exposing his role in the Mumbai blasts, turning Padgha into a jihadi base, and son Shamil’s IED plot in Pune—terror ran in their blood
- "Permission marketing is marketing without interruptions": Supreme Court responds to Vice-President; says as per Constitution, Parliament has right to enact law but Court has power to scrutinize it, Govt functionaries comments on collegium not well taken
- Supreme Court steps in to decide whether Rohingyas are ‘refugees’ or ‘illegal immigrants’, raising critical concerns about whether the judiciary is once again overstepping its constitutional limits and assuming the role meant for the government
- “We know what we are, but know not what we may be”: Every human being has right to choose his or her gender identity: Rajasthan High Court ordered authorities to consider changing the records of a man who secured a job under the General Female Category
- "To no one we shall sell, to no one we shall deny or defer right or justice": Delhi High Court refuses to entertain Sameer Wankhede plea seeking protection in the disproportionate assets case, came to limelight as NCB questioned celebrities in drugs case
- "Excessively harsh": Centre opposes criminalizing marital rape, citing existing laws like Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 498A IPC, and the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, already offer serious penal consequences for violations of consent within marriage
- “A bench of Justices chosen through collegium got to choose to decide who has the better lawyer”: Karnataka government supports High Court verdict upholding marital rape charges against husband which is another stark violation of human rights

























