The petition also challenges a recent ruling by the Karnataka High Court (dated 18 August 2025), which had refused to quash the criminal proceedings against Patil.

The case involved a couple—both previously divorced—who married in January 2010 but separated within just 14 months.

In 2022, the Kerala state government overruled the Waqf Board’s directive. However, the Board challenged the decision in the Kerala High Court.

The case involved a minor charged under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC, along with Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

The case has now reached the SC, but it raises a crucial question: can religion ever come before duty for the Indian Army, or is discipline the only true Dharma of a soldier?

As CJI Gavai emerges as the new darling of the Congress party and its ecosystem, it’s worth recalling how the same Opposition once ignored his statement on Judge Loya’s death simply because it didn’t suit their narrative.

Silencing Rakesh Kishore’s outrage would only amplify awareness of the judiciary’s whims and CJI Gavai’s double standards between Muslim and Hindu petitioners.

Here, Kishore denies any wrongdoing in intent — that is, he insists he acted out of emotional pain, not malice or premeditated violence.

Kishore is a 71-year-old lawyer of the Supreme Court. He is a resident of a resident of Mayur Vihar area of the national capital.

After CJI B R Gavai mocked Lord Vishnu in open court, his mother Kamaltai Gavai has now trashed Hindu traditions by rejecting an RSS Vijayadashami invite, calling it “harmful to social consciousness.”